Steele:
White guilt gave us a mock politics based on the pretense of moral authority.
The
recent flurry of marches, demonstrations and even riots, along with the
Democratic Party’s spiteful reaction to the Trump presidency, exposes what
modern liberalism has become: a politics shrouded in pathos. Unlike the
civil-rights movement of the 1950s and ’60s, when protesters wore their Sunday
best and carried themselves with heroic dignity, today’s liberal marches are
marked by incoherence and downright lunacy—hats designed to evoke sexual
organs, poems that scream in anger yet have no point to make, and an hysterical
anti-Americanism.
All
this suggests lostness, the end of something rather than the beginning. What is
ending?
America,
since the ’60s, has lived through what might be called an age of white guilt.
We may still be in this age, but the Trump election suggests an exhaustion with
the idea of white guilt, and with the drama of culpability, innocence and
correctness in which it mires us.
White
guilt is not actual guilt. Surely most whites are not assailed in the night by
feelings of responsibility for America’s historical mistreatment of minorities.
Moreover, all the actual guilt in the world would never be enough to support
the hegemonic power that the mere pretense of guilt has exercised in American
life for the last half-century.
White
guilt is not angst over injustices suffered by others; it is the terror of
being stigmatized with America’s old bigotries—racism, sexism, homophobia and
xenophobia. To be stigmatized as a fellow traveler with any of these bigotries
is to be utterly stripped of moral authority and made into a pariah. The terror
of this, of having “no name in the street” as the Bible puts it, pressures
whites to act guiltily even when they feel no actual guilt. White guilt is a
mock guilt, a pretense of real guilt, a shallow etiquette of empathy, pity and
regret.
It is
also the heart and soul of contemporary liberalism. This liberalism is the
politics given to us by white guilt, and it shares white guilt’s central
corruption. It is not real liberalism, in the classic sense. It is a mock
liberalism. Freedom is not its raison
d’ĂȘtre; moral authority is.
When
America became stigmatized in the ’60s as racist, sexist and militaristic, it
wanted moral authority above all else. Subsequently the American left
reconstituted itself as the keeper of America’s moral legitimacy.
(Conservatism, focused on freedom and wealth, had little moral clout.) From
that followed today’s markers of white guilt—political correctness, identity
politics, environmental orthodoxy, the diversity cult and so on.
This
was the circumstance in which innocence of America’s bigotries and dissociation
from the American past became a currency of hardcore political power. Barack
Obama and Hillary Clinton, good liberals both, pursued power by offering their
candidacies as opportunities for Americans to document their innocence of the
nation’s past. “I had to vote for Obama,” a rock-ribbed Republican said to me.
“I couldn’t tell my grandson that I didn’t vote for the first black president.”
For this man liberalism was a moral vaccine that immunized him against stigmatization. For Mr. Obama it was raw political power in the real world, enough to lift him—unknown and untested—into the presidency. But for Mrs. Clinton, liberalism was not enough. The white guilt that lifted Mr. Obama did not carry her into office—even though her opponent was soundly stigmatized as an iconic racist and sexist.
For this man liberalism was a moral vaccine that immunized him against stigmatization. For Mr. Obama it was raw political power in the real world, enough to lift him—unknown and untested—into the presidency. But for Mrs. Clinton, liberalism was not enough. The white guilt that lifted Mr. Obama did not carry her into office—even though her opponent was soundly stigmatized as an iconic racist and sexist.
Perhaps
the Obama presidency was the culmination of the age of white guilt, so that
this guiltiness has entered its denouement. There are so many public moments
now in which liberalism’s old weapon of stigmatization shoots blanks—Elizabeth
Warren in the Senate reading a 30-year-old letter by Coretta Scott King, hoping
to stop Jeff Sessions’s appointment as attorney general. There it was with
deadly predictability: a white liberal stealing moral authority from a black
heroine in order to stigmatize a white male as racist. When Ms. Warren was
finally told to sit, there was real mortification behind her glaring eyes.
This
liberalism evolved within a society shamed by its past. But that shame has
weakened now. Our new conservative president rolls his eyes when he is called a
racist, and we all—liberal and conservative alike—know that he isn’t one. The
jig is up. Bigotry exists, but it is far down on the list of problems that
minorities now face. I grew up black in segregated America, where it was hard
to find an open door. It’s harder now for young blacks to find a closed one.
This is
the reality that made Ms. Warren’s attack on Mr. Sessions so tiresome. And it
is what caused so many Democrats at President Trump’s address to Congress to
look a little mortified, defiantly proud but dark with doubt. The sight of them
was a profound moment in American political history.
Today’s
liberalism is an anachronism. It has no understanding, really, of what poverty
is and how it has to be overcome. It has no grip whatever on what American
exceptionalism is and what it means at home and especially abroad. Instead it
remains defined by an America of 1965—an America newly opening itself to its
sins, an America of genuine goodwill, yet lacking in self-knowledge.
This
liberalism came into being not as an ideology but as an identity. It offered
Americans moral esteem against the specter of American shame. This made for a
liberalism devoted to the idea of American shamefulness. Without an ugly America
to loathe, there is no automatic esteem to receive. Thus liberalism’s
unrelenting current of anti-Americanism.
Let’s
stipulate that, given our history, this liberalism is understandable. But
American liberalism never acknowledged that it was about white esteem rather
than minority accomplishment. Four thousand shootings in Chicago last year, and
the mayor announces that his will be a sanctuary city. This is moral esteem
over reality; the self-congratulation of idealism. Liberalism is exhausted
because it has become a corruption.