Sunday, February 9, 2014

Comedian Evan Sayet on Liberals and the Media.

Comedian Evan Sayet: Liberals Think “It’s an Act of Bigotry to Be an Objective Reporter.” By Tim Graham. NewsBusters, February 5, 2014.

Evan Sayet on How Liberals Think. By Rush Limbaugh. RushLimbaugh.com, February 6, 2014.

Evan Sayet: Liberals and the Media. Speech to The Conservative Forum of Silicon Valley. Video. C-Span, January 7, 2014. Alternate filming, video at YouTube.

Sayet:

The modern liberal, there’s something about his ideology that leads him to invariably and inevitably side with evil over good, wrong over right, the lesser over the better, the ugly over the beautiful, the profane over the profound, and the behaviors that lead to failure over those that lead to success.”
 
If no religion, no culture, no person, if no behavior, if no form of governance – if nothing is better than anything else, then success is unjust. Why should a person, a nation, a government, religion succeed, if it’s not better than any other? So that liberalism says “everything is equally good, man, coexist – doesn’t make everything meet in the middle. It makes the better, bad.
 
Failure as proved by nothing other than the fact that it has failed is proof positive that some injustice has taken place. Why should a person, a country, a  nation, a business – why should it fail, if it’s not worse than anything else? And by the same logic, just by extension, if success and failure are proof of injustice, then great success and great failure is proof of great injustice, and at a certain point, great and sustained success and failure – 6,000 years of Jewish survival, thriving when it’s not oppressed; America, the longest surviving and most successful democracy – you wonder why they hate America and Israel most?. . . Great and sustained success and failure is proof positive not just of great and sustained injustice, but that this injustice is intentional, and part of an evil conspiracy.




Peace or the West Bank? By Marc Goldberg.

Peace or the West Bank? By Marc Goldberg. Jerusalem Online, February 9, 2014.

Goldberg:

Unlike previous announcements of settlement building, the latest announcement of 558 new settlement homes will be met with silence. The Americans have learned, it will take more than that to derail a peace process.
 
While these stuttering talks continue, the Palestinians have come out with compromise measure after compromise measure. They have been met by a deeply uncomfortable Israeli leadership. As the talks that were once widely ridiculed bring Israeli security needs and a Palestinian state closer the coalition government becomes weaker.
 
The divisions that were ignored when it was thought that these talks would fade away have become more pronounced now there is a chance for success. The Prime Minister once said:
 
“If the Arabs put down their weapons today, there would be no more violence. If the Jews put down their weapons today, there would be no more Israel‎.
 
When he made that statement few doubted him, but what about now? What about now that Abbas has realised that Palestinian strength lies in not in terror but in testing our claims to want peace more than anything else?
 
The Israeli public went with Barack when he pushed for peace, they went with Sharon when he pushed for peace and with Olmert when he pushed for peace. When the Palestinians pushed these opportunities away the Israeli public went to the Likud. A party whose founder would be turning in his grave if he thought that the current premier was even negotiating over the land promised to the Jews by God. The Likud is a party that was created with the intention of settling that land and making it Jewish, permanently.
 
This must weigh on Bibi while he sits in negotiations. Now is the critical moment when he is forced to confront a changing strategic reality. One that has rendered a great deal of the security argument vis a vis the Palestinians moot.
 
The head of the Palestinian Authority is consenting to an “indefinite presence” of a US led, NATO force on its own territory and for IDF forces to conduct a phased withdrawal over a 3 year period. We in Israel are now confronted with the dilemma of having to admit that the reason Israel is so hell bent on hanging on to the West Bank isn’t merely security.
 
This is the land God promised to our people, the land our forefathers lived in and are buried in, the land Jewish Kings and warriors fought over and shed blood conquering, defending, losing and ultimately conquering once more. This is the land that causes us to question our very essence as a people, as a nation.
 
If it’s possible to liberate dust, rocks and graves then the IDF did precisely that in 1967. But no more. The people born and raised among the dust and rocks have their own way of seeing things. They have a right to. They had no right to rise up and murder us. The horror they inflicted upon was indiscriminate slaughter, waves of terror that served only to strengthen our resolve. From bus bombings to airplane hijackings. We beat that terror, we won the wars and the battles . . . and yet the Palestinians remain.
 
But what do we do now? What do we do now that our enemy is prepared to both abandon terror and to pursue sovereignty just as doggedly as we did some 6 decades ago?
 
They are certainly campaigning diplomatically for us to be forced out of the West Bank and they are meeting with success in every theater.
 
Ironically this is what we have been screaming for them to do for decades, now that they are doing it the Israeli government looks like a deer stuck in the headlights.
 
The choice by Abbas to put down the gun but to raise the megaphone has our politicians running for cover when they should be jumping for joy. The terse statement by Defense Minister Moshe “Boogie” Ya’alon that Israel “will manage without a peace deal” lay the Likud bare. Looking to a past with longing, a promise made by God who has yet to fulfill that promise. They should be looking forward to a future where we achieve things our forefathers never could have dreamed of. That future is waiting for us.
 
I say that the truth is we can’t have it all. We took the land but we weren’t fated to make it ours. We have enough, give the Palestinians theirs, let the Americans patrol it and look to the future of Israel rather than the past.

Saturday, February 8, 2014

Bastille: Pompeii.

Bastille: Pompeii. Video. BastilleVEVO, January 20, 2013. YouTube.



Russians Think We’re Engaging in Olympic Schadenfreude. They’re Right. By Julia Ioffe.

Russians Think We’re Engaging in Olympic Schadenfreude. They’re Right. By Julia Ioffe. The New Republic, February 6, 2014.

Ioffe:

As Western journalists have flooded into Sochi for the 2014 Winter Olympics, they have taken to Twitter to howl about the state of disarray in their hotel rooms. The curtains are broken, the elevators are breaking, the pillows are deficit goods, the water is yellow and cold, and it’s all an unmitigated clusterfuck.
 
And the Russians have had enough. Noting that the lead-up to the Olympics was full of negative cover stories on Russia—like the Economist’s and, well, ours—Vladimir Yakunin, the head of the Russian rail monopoly, slammed Western journalists for “feeding hysteria about Russia.” And he’s not just bothered by the images of Putin on the covers that upset him, or the stories of mind-boggling corruption, or the warnings of “black widows” and “creating fears that the Games in Sochi will not have adequate security.” It’s the vocal, ungrateful complaining about Sochi’s readiness, “which takes the form of mockery worthy of tabloids and not serious journalists.”  “They are sending their readers signals that are far from sportsmanlike, and the tone they take with the country hosting the Olympics is far from friendly,” Yakunin writes. “Really, this has nothing to do with freedom of speech. Rather, it is a desire to befoul everything about the massive effort to prepare for the Winter Games, and to create a negative atmosphere for the athletes and Olympic guests.”
 
Now, Yakunin is a massively corrupt official whose company oversaw a massively corrupt Olympic railway project, and I’d never thought I’d say this, but I agree with him.
 
On one hand, yes, things are objectively dysfunctional and not ready despite the fantastic sums spent, and there is objective photographic evidence of this. On the other, as I prepare for my Moscow-Sochi flight tomorrow, a lot of this complaining does smack of some pretty fantastic schadenfreude. From where I sit—and, granted, I have yet to get to Sochi and encounter the shock of cold water in the shower, and, granted, I’m a fine practicioner of mocking Russian ridiculousness—it does seem like the Western press is on the hunt for evidence of how inept and hilarious the Russians are. There does seem to be something mean-spirited in all of this, as if the Western press came hoping to encounter pillow shortages and rusty water.
                                                                      
Again, the evidence of failure is incontrovertible and embarrassing, but it is also, in the scheme of things, minor. So far, nothing major has happened. Ski jumps have yet to collapse, trains have yet to derail, there’s just some cold water and an upside down toilet lid. It’s inconvenient and, yes, it’s funny, but here’s where I agree with Yakunin: it’s the tone. There’s a fine line between fair criticism and schadenfreude, and the Western press has been largely well on the side of the latter. I’d also argue that there's something chauvinistic, even Russophobic in it. The Europeans may not be ready for their Olympics, but, okay, we’ll give them the benefit of the doubt and hope for the best. The Chinese prepare for theirs ruthlessly, but we don’t understand them so whatever. We railed on Romney for daring to criticize the preparedness of our British friends, and we wrote in muted tones about Athens not being ready in time for their Olympics, but with the Russians, we gloat: Look at these stupid savages, they can’t do anything right.
 
Within hours of arriving in Moscow yesterday, Russian friends, even the Westernized ones, those who are openly, viciously critical of the Kremlin, have expressed their hurt at the Western blooper coverage of Sochi. A whole lot of their tax money has been spent on something they may not have wanted and in ways they find criminally wasteful, and, yes, their government has not done much to endear itself to the West of late, but they’re puzzled by why the Americans and the British are so very happy that the details are a little screwy, the way they generally are in Russia.
 
The word they use is zloradstvo, literally: evil-reveling.


I Want the Olympics to Succeed. On TV, the Opening Ceremony Did. By T.A. Frank. The New Republic, February 8, 2014.

In Praise of Sochi Schadenfreude. Here’s why we should celebrate Russia's failure. By David Harsanyi. The Federalist, February 7, 2014.

Harsanyi:

A few months prior to the 2008 Summer Olympics games in Beijing, there was an Olympic torch running ceremony in the Tibetan capital of Lhasa. There, the nation’s Communist Party leader, Zhang Qingli, declared that “China’s red flag with five stars will forever flutter high above this land” before dropping a bit Jesse Myerson-ish rhetoric on folks, explaining that China would “totally smash the splittist schemes of the Dalai Lama clique.”
 
Qingli saw the Olympics as optimal moment to launch into some political haranguing, because the Olympics is a political event. Always has been. And sporadically, regimes in various stages of authoritarianism, say the Nazis or the Chinese Communists or the Russian Putinists, use this overhyped and overrated sporting exhibition to try and convince others of the superiority of their regimes. This is why the Germans made a spectacle in 1936, why the Soviets spent decades trying to create Ivan Dragos — and also why, the 1980 United States ice hockey victory over Soviet Union team was, for many of us, the greatest sports moment of all time.
 
Here’s how Charles Lane put it in a superb column detailing the uselessness of the event:
Whatever might be said for that idea in theory, it hasn’t panned out in practice. The ostensibly apolitical Games have been marred by several boycotts — of Montreal in 1976 (by African nations protesting apartheid), of Moscow in 1980 (by the United States and other Western countries protesting the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan) and of Los Angeles in 1984 (by communist countries retaliating for 1980).
 
The Games also have created a target for extremists, from the Palestinian terrorists who killed 11 Israeli athletes at Munich in 1972 to ultra-rightist Eric Rudolph, who placed a deadly bomb at the 1996 Summer Games in Atlanta. Consequently, these celebrations of international conviviality proceed under heavy military guard.
On the bright side, Sochi has been utter embarrassment for Vladimir Putin – or, in other words, though it’s hardly started, it’s been the rare entertaining Olympic experience. (update: Yes, this includes opening ceremonies, with its Cirque du Soleil celebration of 20th-century tyranny.)
 
We’ve seen an avalanche of tweets from Western journalists about the crude amenities in Sochi, the architectural challenges, the unfinished hotel rooms, the stray dogs, the yellow drinking water, the garbage, not to mention the embargo of imperialist Greek yogurt to American athletes.
 
Vladimir Yakunin, a Russian plutocrat who, unlike some less vigilant magnates, knows where his black bread is buttered, groused about Western journalists who were “feeding hysteria about Russia.” Some people wondered if it was fair? Here’s Julia Ioffe at the New Republic:
There’s a fine line between fair criticism and schadenfreude, and the Western press has been largely well on the side of the latter. I’d also argue that there’s something chauvinistic, even Russophobic in it.
Russophobic? As in harboring negative prejudices, dislikes and fears about Russia and Russians? The place that gave us Dostoyevsky, Stravinsky, Solzhenitsyn and so on and on and on . . . ? Hardly. Is it Russophobic to have a good laugh at the expense of a crooked government that squanders an estimated $50 billion on a publicity party when its per capita income is less than that of Equatorial Guinea or Gabon? A country that is 140th in on the economic freedom index, according to Heritage Foundation, slotted between Tajikistan and Burundi.
 
These Olympics might even end up doing the Russians a favor by bringing attention to their plight. Maybe Sochi will be seen as an event emblematic of the deeper problems in the country, As Garry Kasparov puts it:
Do not mistake the epic graft in Sochi as unusual or incidental. Corruption is the overriding principle of Putin’s 14 years in power and looting the Russian treasury and the Russian people is itself the goal. For all the foolish attempts to interpret Putin’s geopolitical strategy and personal ideology, the common denominator is always whether or not an action helps him maintain the cash flow that in turn enables him and his clique to stay in power.
We don’t even have to bring up the fact that Putin has consistently undermined American interests, abetting brutal dictatorships in Syria and North Korea – not to mention, shielding Iran’s nuclear ambitions. Surrounded by an army of 40,000 soldiers and police in a “ring of steel,” Bob Costas can whitewash his host’s misdeeds, but Russia’s government is not only corrupt, and not only is it intolerant of gays, but according to Amnesty International, human rights violations by the government include killings, enforced disappearances and torture, and they are “frequent.” According  to Freedom of Information index by Reporters Without Borders, Putin belongs on a list with Chinese President Xi Jinping, North Korea’s Kim Jong-un, Iran’s Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, the Italian Mafia and Chechnya’s Ramzan Kadyrov.
 
That’s not to say that Russians, with or without Putin, don’t have a long way to go. It’s not to say that the Russian people don’t have their quirks. But if Sochi is, as Putin claims, a vision a “new Russia,” lots of people around the world will see that the new Russia is extraordinarily similar to the old Russia.
 
This is his Olympics. We should all get in a good laugh at his misfortune.
 

Sochi 2014 opening ceremony: Ernst delivers disco-led paean to the past. By Owen Gibson. The Guardian, February 7, 2014.

Gibson:

But after all the talk of oppressive security, the disgrace of recently introduced anti-gay laws, Russia’s human rights record and Putin’s macho shows of strength, it was somehow refreshing that Konstantin Ernst chose to at least try to highlight another side of the country’s character.
 
“I wanted to present the history of Russia as seen though the eyes of a little girl, who represents the feminine side of Russia,” he said. “The real Russians, untainted by decades of propaganda and the cold war.” Malfunctioning snowflakes aside, he largely succeeded.


Sochi’s Opening Ceremony Forgot to Mention a Few Things About Russian History. By Julia Ioffe. The New Republic, February 8, 2014.

Irina Rodnina, the Woman Lighting the Sochi Olympic Flame, Tweeted a Racist, Doctored Picture of President Obama. By Julia Ioffe. The New Republic, February 7, 2014.

Irina Rodnina, Former Russian Skater Who Lit Olympic Flame, Tweeted Racist Obama Photo. By Andrew Hart. The Huffington Post, February 7, 2014.

Russian MP Irina Rodnina’s Obama with banana picture sparks racism debate. By Shaun Walker. The Guardian, September 16, 2013.

Welcome to Sochi: Beware the Water. By Stacy St. Clair. NJBR, February 5, 2014.

My So-Called Revolution. By Julia Ioffe.


Maria Baronova


My So-Called Revolution: The Loneliness of Vladimir Putin. By Julia Ioffe. The New Republic, February 2, 2014. From the February 17, 2014 issue. Also here.

He crushed his opposition and has nothing to show for it but a country that’s falling apart.


Why Did Someone Put a Giant Wooden Cock on a Kremlin Critic Katya Romanovskaya’s Car? Buy Julia Ioffe. The New Republic, February 3, 2014.

Maria Baronova: Lady Dada. By Julia Ioffe. The New Republic, August 2, 2012. From the August 23, 2012 issue. Also here.

Maria Baronova: A Face of the Russian Protest Movement. New York Times, June 25, 2012.

Maria Baronova talks with soldiers guarding the Kremlin (in Russian). Video, Vodkerr, May 6, 2012. YouTube.



The Geopolitics of Sochi. By Michael A. Reynolds.

The Geopolitics of Sochi. By Michael A. Reynolds. Real Clear World, February 5, 2014. Also at Foreign Policy Research Institute.

Sarah Brightman: Stranger in Paradise. Alexander Borodin: Polovtsian Dances.

Sarah Brightman: Stranger in Paradise. Live from Las Vegas 2004. Video. Angelheart1959, January 8, 2014. YouTube. Also here. From the DVD Harem: Live from Las Vegas.




Sarah Brightman: Stranger in Paradise. Studio version from Harem. Video. lovechangeall, June 15, 2010.




Sarah Brightman: Stranger in Paradise. Studio version from Harem. Audio. Abrakt, November 1, 2013. YouTube.




Alexander Borodin: Polovtsian Dances from Prince Igor. Bolshoi Theatre. Video. Dragoslav S, June 16, 2013. YouTube.




Borodin: Polovtsian Dances from Prince Igor. Kirov Opera Company. Video. John J, March 5, 2012. YouTube.




Alexander Borodin: Prince Igor. Complete. Video. Pavel Karmanov, June 19, 2013. YouTube.



Thursday, February 6, 2014

Wednesday, February 5, 2014

At SodaStream, Palestinians Hope Their Bubble Won’t Burst. By Elhanan Miller.



Sodastream CEO Daniel Birnbaum stands next to Palestinian and Jewish employees, February 2, 2014 [photo credit: Elhanan Miller/TOI].


At SodaStream, Palestinians hope their bubble won’t burst. By Elhanan Miller. The Times of Israel, February 3, 2014.

Seeing SodaStream for myself. By Simon Plosker. The Times of Israel, February 3, 2014.

Demonizing Israel; Demonizing ScarJo. By Jonathan S. Tobin. NJBR, January 28, 2014. With related articles and video.


Miller:

A manual worker at the settlement-based factory that sparked the Scarlett Johansson controversy, Nahida Fares of Ramallah earns triple the pay of her husband, an officer in the PA.


MISHOR ADUMIM, West Bank — The SodaStream factory, situated just off the highway leading down from Jerusalem to the Dead Sea, was abuzz on Sunday with journalists from across the globe trying to get a glimpse of the action.
 
The tour of the carbonated beverage-maker plant was organized especially for curious foreign correspondents on the eve of the Super Bowl, which featured an ad starring its glamorous spokeswoman Scarlett Johansson. The factory, SodaStream’s charismatic US-born CEO Daniel Birnbaum proudly declared, used to produce munitions for the Israeli army. It was bought in 1996 by the fizzy drink start-up, seeking to better the world by doing away with polluting plastic bottles.
 
A statue at the entrance to the plant, Birnbaum pointed out, encapsulated the company spirit with the immortal words of the prophet Isaiah: “And they shall beat their swords into plowshares, and their spears into pruning hooks; nation shall not lift up sword against nation, neither shall they learn war any more.”
 
SodaStream’s business has grown exponentially since Birnbaum was hired by the private equity firm that bought the company in 2007. Under the previous management, SodaStream manufactured 20,000-30,000 counter-top soda machines a month. Now it produces that number every day.
 
As SodaStream’s global market expanded, so did its need for manual laborers. Today, the Mishor Adumim plant — the first of eight Israeli locations and 22 worldwide — employs 1,300 workers; 950 Arabs (450 Israeli and 500 Palestinian) and 350 Israeli Jews. Salaries and work benefits — management asserts and workers confirm — are equal for all workers in comparable jobs, regardless of ethnicity or citizenship. The factory secures Israeli work permits for its Palestinian employees as well as rides from their home and back, SodaStream’s Chief Operating Officer Yossi Azarzar told The Times of Israel.
 
Proponents of the BDS (boycott, divestment and sanction) campaign posit that any Israeli business located beyond the 1949 armistice frontier known as the Green Line is by definition exploitative, in addition to being illegal under international law. They castigated Johannson for representing the firm; she rejected the onslaught — declaring that “SodaStream is a company that is not only committed to the environment but to building a bridge to peace between Israel and Palestine” — and resigned as an ambassador for British-based charity Oxfam when they critiqued her role.
 
Birnbaum, the CEO, was clearly cognizant of the dispute. He spoke of Jewish-Arab coexistence as he stood next to a veiled young Arab woman working on the assembly line across from an older woman with a black head covering who immigrated to Israel from the former Soviet Union in 1993.
 
Zooming in on Birnbaum and the two women, the camera crews and microphone-holding reporters overlooked another young Palestinian woman standing nearby, fitting plastic valves into a large metal tray. Nahida Fares, 28, graduated Nablus’s A-Najjah University in primary school education. She began working for Israeli companies two years ago, when she could find no work in her field in Ramallah, where she lives with her husband and infant child.
 
“There are no job opportunities in the West Bank,” Fares told The Times of Israel. “Even the jobs that do exist pay no more than NIS 1,500-2,000 ($430-570) a month.” Fares now earns triple those sums.
 
Many educated women like Fares were forced to seek work outside the home following the outbreak of the Second Intifada in 2000 to support the household as the Palestinian economy collapsed, she explained.
 
Fares’s husband, a first lieutenant in the Palestinians’ prestigious Preventive Security Force, earns NIS 2,000 ($570) per month after 10 years of service.
 
Given the relatively low levels of political violence in recent years, the Israeli Coordinator of Government Activities in the Territories (COGAT) has increased the number of work permits granted to Palestinians by some 37% between 2010 and 2012. Still, Palestinian men must be above the age 24 and married with a child to be eligible for work permits within Israel. Israeli workers’ unions do not protect Palestinians from exploitation by employers, critics note.
 
To work in a settlement, however, a Palestinian man need only be older than 18 and have no negative security record. To work in Israel, Palestinians must apply to the Israeli Population and Immigration Authority; to work in an Israeli settlement in the West Bank (like the Mishor Adumim industrial zone) they must apply to the Civil Administration, the branch of COGAT entrusted with Palestinian civilian matters. A COGAT spokesman told The Times of Israel in a written response that 24,000 permits are given to Palestinians wishing to work in the settlements on average every month. More than double that number (49,250) were allowed to work in Israel in January, mostly in the construction industry.
 
Fares, for instance, first began working at a laundromat in the Mishor Adumim industrial zone (where SodaStream is located), but left because of management mistreatment. At SodaStream she is much happier, working a 12-hour shift from 7 a.m. to 7 p.m. and receiving a 15-30 minute break for every two hours of work. Food in the cafeteria is great, she said, as she showed me the valve that she boasted is “the most important component of the soda dispenser.”
 
Another employee, Sa’ida, 28, began studying Hebrew in her hometown of Jericho but only started using it at the plant, where she first came in contact with Israeli Jews. Jews and Arabs mix freely here, she noted; “they even change clothes together,” she said, and blushed.
 
While declining to discuss the political ramifications of her sensitive employment at Mishor Adumim (working in settlements is illegal under Palestinian law), Sa’ida said she and her colleagues were wondering why SodaStream had been singled out by the media from all the other companies in the industrial zone.
 
“It’s because of Scarlett Johansson,” she was told.


Plosker:

When asked about the effect of the BDS campaign on SodaStream’s business, Birnbaum pointed to 30-40% growth over the past five years. The people who pay the price for boycotts are the Palestinian workers themselves. Some Scandinavian countries have demanded that their SodaStream products be sourced from elsewhere, instead preferring that they get their goods made in that beacon of human rights, China. Were it not for a boycott like this, the Mishor Adumim factory would employ more Palestinians.
 
Asked about the current controversy and publicity, Birnbaum stated that it is convenient and popular to demonize Israel and that NGOs such as Oxfam were more concerned with attacking Israel than dealing with human rights. After all, what would be achieved if SodaStream were to lay off hundreds of Palestinians leaving them jobless with no way to feed their families?
 
Birnbaum also accused Oxfam of funding groups responsible for the BDS campaign.
 
I was tremendously impressed with Daniel Birnbaum’s commitment to peaceful co-existence and SodaStream’s practical role in promoting it. While the boycotters may wish to see the factory closed down, he would not let his workers down.
 
Less impressive, however, was the line of questioning from many of the journalists. The same people who had just met with and interviewed Palestinians happy with their lot were still unable to get beyond their preconceptions. It seems that even if Birnbaum were to throw wads of free cash for the Palestinians, it wouldn’t be good enough for them.
 
In their eyes, the welfare of ordinary Palestinians is secondary to the wider consideration of cleansing Jews from the West Bank. Sadly, some of the journalists’ worldview evidently isn’t that far from that of the BDS movement.


Israelis, Palestinians, and the Status Quo. By Tom Wilson.

Israelis, Palestinians, and the Status Quo. By Tom Wilson. Commentary, February 3, 2014.

Wilson:

With Secretary of State Kerry gradually unveiling his proposal for a solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, it is worth asking what it is that Kerry seeks to solve. The present situation is certainly far from ideal. Yet, most Israelis feel safe most of the time and most Palestinians don’t live under “occupation”; they live in areas controlled and governed by the Palestinian Authority. In the last decade this conflict has generated comparatively fewer casualties than those in nearby countries and if one doesn’t count Hezbollah-controlled southern Lebanon or Hamas-controlled Gaza, which are after all not even being included in Kerry’s peace plan, then the Israeli-Palestinian conflict of recent years has been positively uneventful. A cold war between Israel and the PA.
 
For most Israelis and most Palestinians the present situation is tolerated with the understanding that this is not a permanent arrangement. What each side thinks a permanent arrangement should look like, however, is still vastly different. In this way the unresolved nature of the standoff leaves open the hope for each side that their vision will win out. Drawing from this, there are those on the two sides that prefer perpetuating and advancing the status quo, even if only as means of keeping open the possibility of achieving more far-reaching objectives in the long run. For these parties it has essentially become about playing the long game. For each the hoped-for future remaining just out of reach.
 
While the Palestinian population in the West Bank is clearly far from happy with the status quo, it also seems that they prefer an outcome that is unachievable as things stand. Electoral support for Hamas and polling of Palestinians in recent years would suggest most Palestinians either reject the two-state proposal outright, or they believe two states should be used as a step toward eventually eliminating the Jewish state. The dream of seeing Israel ended and Palestinians return in its place has remained prominent and unaltered, constituting the core of Palestinian identity ever since it was formed in the aftermath of Israel’s establishment. This is what most Palestinian politicians continue to express support for–in Arabic at least–and it’s what they broadcast on their television networks and teach in their schools.
 
The Palestinian leadership also has multiple practical reasons for maintaining the status quo. For one thing, they have long grown fat on the financial aid and sympathy that comes with playing the part of the ever-destitute nation. They are also confident that under the status quo they are better able to advance their strategy for weakening Israel, chipping away at its international legitimacy while believing that demographics are ultimately on their side. With every round of negotiations they have been able to win more concessions from Israel, the consensus about the final-status parameters gradually drifting in their favor. When new talks begin it is with Israel’s previous concessions assumed as given, with the expectation that Israel now agree to further demands. The division of Jerusalem and land swaps being a case in point. Each time the amount Israel is obliged to offer increases.
 
The Israeli public became sick of policing the West Bank decades ago. The electoral success of those promising to end the impasse has been persistent, even in the face of unrelenting Palestinian terrorism. However, this hope for peace accompanied by the constant background noise of violence against Israeli civilians creates a strange kind of cognitive dissonance. Israelis find themselves unwilling to stay with the present arrangement, while not quite able to embrace a new one.
 
Land-for-peace compromises only served to weaken Israel’s security, undermining the left-wing peace camp, adding weight to the arguments of Israel’s security hawks who, like many Israelis, still hope for a complete and definitive defeat of Palestinian terrorism. These voices insist that given current Palestinian attitudes and incitement, for now it is safer to manage the conflict than attempt to solve it. For such an agreement would mean evacuating the strategically vital Jordan Valley and abandoning the West Bank hilltops that overlook Israel’s narrow coastal strip where its major population centers, industrial infrastructure, and transit network are all situated. Israel would have to do this knowing a Palestinian state has every likelihood of turning out to be another failed state, a terror state and an Iranian satellite. Far better, they argue, to have the IDF in the West Bank, keeping Hamas and Islamic Jihad at bay, while strengthening the Jewish presence in the settlement blocks ensures that the areas most vital to Israel’s future will be retained in any agreement.
 
In this way the unhappy status quo at least leaves open the possibility to people on both sides of eventually achieving their most precious objectives. The problem with Kerry’s final-status plan is that it threatens to permanently slam the door firmly shut on these hopes. We have already seen what unsettling the status quo looks like. It was during the Oslo years that suicide bombers first ventured into Israel’s cities. Equally, the failure of the Camp David peace talks in 2000 played no small part in unleashing the horrors of the second intifada.
 
Israel and the PA have already agreed to disagree, for now. Kerry may yet come to wish he’d left well enough alone.


Welcome to Sochi: Beware the Water. By Stacy St. Clair.


The accommodation and facilities complex, under construction in Sochi, with the Bolshoi Ice Dome in the background, on December 2, 2012. Construction is due to be completed by August 2013 according to organizers. (Reuters/Pawel Kopczynski).


Welcome to Sochi: Beware the water. By Stacy St. Clair. Chicago Tribune, February 5, 2014.

St. Clair:

SOCHI, Russia — The alarms sounded every 45 minutes, with a stern Russian woman advising that a fire had been reported and the hotel needed to be evacuated immediately.
 
I believed it the first time.
 
And the second.
 
I might have fallen for it a third time Tuesday morning, if I hadn’t thrown caution to the bone-tired, jet-lagged wind and decided to stay in bed. Whatever would befall me, it had to be better than wandering along the western Caucasus Mountains in my pajamas.
 
It was already 5:50 a.m. and I couldn’t fall back to sleep so I figured I would just begin my day. I turned on the water to brush my teeth, but nothing came out. Just the gagging, asthmatic sound of pipes wanting to produce water.
 
I tried to flip on the shower. It wouldn’t work. The toilets wouldn’t flush either.
 
I called the front desk.
 
“It will be fixed in 40 minutes,” the sympathetic man at the reception desk told me. “But when it comes back on, please do not use on your face because it contains something very dangerous.”
 
Welcome to Sochi 2014, the dystopian-like Games where a simple shower poses a threat to your face, fire alarms ring constantly and several hotels remain unfinished. Russian President Vladimir Putin spent more than $50 billion on these Games — the most expensive Olympics, winter or summer, ever — yet he seemingly forgot to pay the water bill.
 
No one likes to hear sportswriters complain about their hotels. I’m not a sportswriter, so believe me when I swear that I mock those whiners right along with you.
 
But this is different.
 
The Sochi Olympics aren’t just a sporting event. They represent Putin’s pride, his metaphoric muscle flexing in an effort to show the international community just how virile his country has become under his leadership. He dared the world to admire Russia’s ability to produce these Games, so we must.
 
And, in some respects, the effort looks extraordinarily weak.
 
Only six of nine media hotels were finished on time, leaving hundreds of reporters scrambling to find temporary lodging.
 
When the water eventually came back on at my hotel — my temporary housing for a night until my scheduled room could be finished — the water that poured through the faucet was dark yellow. It was the color of apple juice or a performance enhancing drug test specimen. The shower left what looked like fish food flakes coating the tub.
 
I took a picture of the water and tweeted it out.
 
“On the bright side,” I wrote, “I now know what dangerous face water looks like.”
 
My tweets about the water went viral — more than 1,500 people have retweeted it — not because I wrote something exceptionally clever, but because I pointed out the annoyances that many here have endured.
 
One of my colleagues, for example, went to his assigned hotel room only to find an AP photographer already sleeping there. Others have dealt with a lack of hot water, sheetless beds and baths without shower curtains.
 
“Congrats to @Dave _Schwartz only media personality who’s arrived in Sochi with a hotel room that’s ready, with doorknob that doesn't fall off,” Minnesota Wild spokesman Ryan Stanzel tweeted.
 
International Olympic Committee President Thomas Bach told reporters Monday that 97 percent of Sochi hotel rooms were delivered without a problem. Only 3 percent of the rooms — about 750 total — had some kind of a problem, he said.
 
“I have some travel experience and I know how embarrassing it is when you arrive after a long flight to a place and your room is not ready,” he said.
 
I’m not sure why Bach thinks I should be embarrassed by my ‘bathroom faucet spitting urine-colored water. First of all, I ended up washing my face with bottled Evian water, which made me feel like a Kardashian.
 
And, second, it’s made me extremely popular among my fellow journalists here in southwestern Russia. I’ve received tweets in Russian, German, Danish and languages I have not yet determined.
 
On a bus down the mountainside Tuesday night a Swedish photographer came up and asked if I was the person who tweeted the hotel photo.
 
“You are the dangerous face water woman, right?” he said.
 
I am now. Thanks a lot, Putin.


Sochi hotel tells our reporter: Don’t let dangerous water touch your face. By Scott Kleinberg. Chicago Tribune, February 4, 2014.

The Disaster That Is My Sochi Hotel: Stacy St. Clair had quite the morning in Sochi. By Kate Seamons. Newser, February 5, 2014.

15 signs that Russia is not very ready for the Olympics. By Caitlin Dewey and Max Fisher. Washington Post, February 5, 2014. Also here.

Stacy St. Clair tweet. Twitter, February 3, 2014, 7:02 PM. 7:57 PM. 8:00 PM.


 
 
 
 
 


Stacy St. Clair, Chicago Tribune.


Putin Pets a Persian Leopard. By Stephen R. Hurst and Nataliya Vasilyeva.

Putin, Persian leopard in pitch-perfect photo-op. By Stephen R. Hurst and Nataliya Vasilyeva. AP. AOL, February 4, 2014. Also at The Christian Science Monitor.

Putin and the snow leopard: Russia’s leader pictured stroking a big (tame) cat as the country prepares to host the Sochi Winter Olympics. Daily Mail, February 4, 2014.



Russia’s President Vladimir Putin caresses a Persian leopard cub as he visits the Persian leopard breeding and rehabilitation centre in the National Park in the Black Sea resort of Sochi, on February 4, 2014. (ALEXEI NIKOLSKY/AFP/Getty Images.)


Stephen Walt Is the George Kennan of the Obama Administration. By Lee Smith

As George Kennan Inspired Truman’s Foreign Policy, Now Stephen Walt Inspires Obama’s. By Lee Smith. Tablet, February 5, 2014.

Plenty of pundits have jockeyed to be the top voice on the Middle East, but only one person’s ideas dominate the conversation.


Stephen Walt is Not Obama’s George Kennan. By Zachary Keck. The Diplomat, February 10, 2014.

Slouching Toward Offshore Balancing. James R. Holmes. The Diplomat, February 9, 2014.

From Preponderance to Offshore Balancing:America’s Future Grand Strategy. By Christopher Layne. International Security, Vol. 22, No. 1 (Summer 1997).

Saeb Erekat and Tzipi Livni Clash Over Historical Narratives at the Munich Security Conference.

Erekat, Livni argue history at Munich meeting. Ma’an News Agency, February 2, 2014.

World should punish “racist” Israel, PA official says. By Gavriel Fiske. The Times of Israel, February 4, 2014.

The Talks, Round Two. By Roger Cohen. New York Times, February 3, 2014.

Saab Erekat: Palestinians Were Here Before the Jews. NJBR, February 3, 2014.

Breakout Session: The Middle East Peace Process. Video. Munich Security Conference, January 31, 2014. Livini-Erekat exchange starts at 50:55. Erekat’s remarks/tirade on his historical narrative as a proud son of Jericho with roots 5500 years before Joshua ben Nun start at 58:35.