The Elder and the “Assumed Symmetry Fallacy.” By Michael Lumish. Israel Thrives, April 3, 2014. Also at Elder of Ziyon.
Lumish:
The
Elder of Ziyon has a recent piece entitled, Peter Beinart cannot tell the difference between a “narrative” and a fact.
Speaking
before a group of Democrats and progressives, former New Republic editor, Peter
Beinart, said the following concerning conservative billionaire Sheldon
Adelson:
In 2008, when Tel Aviv University’s Shlomo
Sand published a book called “The Invention off the Jewish People,” he was widely
called anti-Semitic. When Adelson says the same about Palestinians, he’s a
Republican rock star.
This is
an example of what the Elder calls the "Assumed Symmetry Fallacy."
He
writes:
I am
not a logician and do not know of a formal name for this fallacy, but let’s
call it the Assumed Symmetry Fallacy: the assumption that two sides – by virtue
of their opposition – are falsely assumed to be symmetric.
This is
a very important insight and one that we need to consider and discuss. The western world tends to think of the Arab
war against the Jews as a matter of symmetry.
They use terms like “cycles of violence” or the
“Israel-Palestine” conflict, both of which suggest a symmetry of
power and hostility.
This is
not merely a matter of false analogy, as one of his commenters suggests, but of
a systemic bias against the Jewish minority in the Middle East via medias and
governments throughout the world. It is
a bias in which it generally suggested that the Jewish minority deserves a good
beating because we are mean to the “Palestinians.”
The
Jews of the Middle East, via the State of Israel, are now a powerful people and
we should be very proud, as Jews and friends of the Jewish State, of their
accomplishments. The success of Israel is nothing short of remarkable, given
its humble beginnings. Israel has the most powerful military in the entire
region and one of the best economies, given its relative size, of any country
in the world. Israel is creative, innovative, technological,
internationally-minded, and sophisticated.
However,
the Jews of the Middle East also represent a tiny minority surrounded by a much
larger, hostile majority of Muslims who have made it very clear, over the long
and brutal course of 1,400 years, that they simply will not stand for Jewish
sovereignty on historically Jewish land and will do everything within their
power to make life miserable for the Jewish minority. They teach their children
that Jews are the descendants of apes and pigs and that killing Jewish people
is pleasing in the sight of Allah. They wage war against us. They shoot rockets
at us. They strap suicide belts onto women and children because when Muslim
women and children commit suicide in an effort to murder Jews it is considered
not merely a noble act, but the most noble spiritual act of the shaheed.
The
truth of the matter is that in the Long Arab War Against the Jews of the Middle
East, there is no symmetry. In terms of numbers, resources, land mass, every
advantage goes to the Arabs. They outnumber the Jews by a factor of 60 or 70 to
1 throughout the region. They conquered and control over 99% of the entire
Middle East, with the sole exception of the Jewish State of Israel, and are
driving Christians out of the region entirely. They hold all non-Muslims under
submission to Islam within the system of dhimmitude
since the rise of that religion in the 7th century.
And now
they literally create a brand-spanking new people, the “Palestinians,” for the
distinct purpose of countering Jewish sovereignty and freedom on historically
Jewish land. So, no, there is no symmetry in this fight.
The
Jews are fighting to maintain freedom and sovereignty and the great Arab
majority is dedicated to destroying that freedom and sovereignty and will ruin
their own cousins, the Palestinian-Arabs, in order to keep them as the dagger
pointed at the heart of the Jewish people on Jewish land.
Peter
Beinart, it should be noted, is perhaps the single foremost example of Jewish dhimmitude in the public square today.
He represents an excellent example of the kind of Jewish
"progressive" who cannot only not bring himself to take his own side
in a fight, but who has so incorporated the "Palestinian narrative"
of pristine victim-hood into his understanding of the conflict that he honestly
believes that the besieged Jewish minority in the Middle East are the
aggressors upon their former Arab-Muslim masters.
Finally,
and most importantly, the Elder is generally correct when he writes this:
The
Palestinian Arabs are a recently invented people. They exist today, to be sure,
but they were not a “people” before 1948 at the very earliest. Westerners who
drew the borders after World War I created what today's Palestinian Arabs
laughably call “historic Palestine” – arbitrary lines that surrounded a people
who had as much in common with those across those lines as with those within
them. Arabs in the Galilee had more in common with those in Damascus than those
in Bethlehem. Tribes and families trumped geography (and they often still do.)
They became a “people” because of how their Arab brethren refused to allow them
to integrate into their countries, forcing them to suffer as a separate group
that eventually did turn them into a people. Arabs themselves admit freely that
they kept Palestinian Arabs in miserable conditions in order to foster their
nascent “unity.”
And
that, of course, is his primary point concerning the Assumed Symmetry Fallacy.
The Jews have been a people for over 3,500 years and perhaps considerably
longer. Among the peoples of the earth the Jews, along with the Chinese and
other indigenous peoples, are among the oldest on the planet. Jews are also,
along with native Americans, for example, among the most persecuted. The
Palestinian-Arabs, by contrast, only emerged as an allegedly distinct people toward
the end of the twentieth-century and did so for the specific purpose of beating
up on the Jews.
And I
suppose this is where I disagree with the Elder. Are the “Palestinians” a
distinct and separate people from Jordanian Arabs or Syrian Arabs or Egyptian
Arabs? The classical definition of nationhood would suggest not. So-called “Palestinians”
share the same religion with other Arabs, the same food-stuffs, generally
speaking, with other Arabs, the same language and traditions. The “Palestinians”
are Arabs. Period. And, in fact, most of them immigrated into the area
following the Jewish aliyahs around
the turn of the century.
The
Jewish people are under no obligation to recognize a brand-new allegedly
distinct people who came into existence for the explicit purpose of robbing the
tiny Jewish minority of sovereignty on Jewish land.
The
truth of the matter is that we owe them nothing.
If this
sounds rather harsh, I am sorry, but the “Palestinians” have turned down every
single offer for a state in peace next to Israel since 1937. They are never
going to accept a Jewish presence with autonomy on land that was once captured
by the forces of Islam, because to do so contradicts the very reason that they
came into existence as an allegedly distinct ethnicity to begin with.
What
the Elder understands, and what Beinart clearly does not, is that there is no
symmetry. Shlomo Sand is a racist and a traitor to his people. The very notion
that the Jews are a recently invented people is historically preposterous and
Sand is a fraud. Adelson, however, whatever one may make of his politics, was
correct if he suggested that the “Palestinians” are a newly invented people.
This is
not a matter of opinion.
It is a
matter of fact.
