The Death of a Mideast Theory. By Greg Scoblete.
The Death of a Mideast Theory. By Greg Scoblete. Real Clear World, January 8, 2014.
Scoblete:
Anyone
paying even modest attention to the news knows that the Middle East is
convulsed with violence. Iraq is battling a resurgent al-Qaeda, Syria is mired
in a brutal civil war that is creeping steadily into Lebanon, Egypt is perched
on the brink of violent instability. All the while, U.S. Secretary of State
John Kerry busies himself trying to broker a “framework agreement” between the
Israelis and Palestinians. (Actually, this is what Kerry says he's doing: “We
are working on a framework for negotiations that will guide and create the
clear, detailed, accepted road map for the guidelines for the permanent-status
negotiations and can help those negotiations move faster and more effectively.”
Got it?)
There
was a time, not so long ago, when many in Washington could argue with a straight face that solving the Israeli-Palestinian crisis was central to a more
peaceful Middle East. The Israeli-Palestinian dispute was “linked” to regional unrest. If the U.S. would just untangle that stubborn knot, we've been told, it
would set the Middle East on a more peaceful track.
If
nothing else comes from the Mideast’s current orgy of violence, it should at
least discredit the notion of linkage. The disparate strands of violence
convulsing the region won’t end or even conceivably slow down should the
Israelis and Palestinians bury the hatchet. None of the groups currently
picking up arms in Syria, Iraq, Egypt, et al., are doing so on behalf of the
Palestinians, though undoubtedly many would turn their guns on Israel if and
when they get the chance. Secretary Kerry is, by all accounts, expending
enormous amounts of time, effort and diplomatic capital on reaching his “framework
for negotiations toward a roadmap for talks” – and for what?
Meanwhile,
Japan – a country which the U.S. has an unambiguous stake in defending -- is
inching perilously close to a confrontation with China and driving a wedge
between itself and South Korea. The Middle East, for all its oil and violence,
is beyond the reach of U.S. power and mediation. The kinds of state-building
required to pacify the region is too costly and difficult (something you would
think Washington would comprehend by now).
But
Asia remains an arena where U.S. power and statecraft may actually be
effective, given that the challenges are between
states and not within them. At a minimum, it would be certainly be time better
spent than trying to determine who lives where in the West Bank.