Egypt’s Liberals Have a Weak Hand – and They Know It. By Walter Russell Mead. Via Meadia, February 22, 2013.
More on Morsi and Egypt here.
Mead:
When an
opposition thinks it can win an election, it normally demands early ones. That
opponents of Egypt’s Muslim Brotherhood are angry about the prospect of an
election just a few weeks from now tells us exactly what they think about their
popularity in Egypt.
Many
things are happening in Egypt, not least of which is a general economic
meltdown that threatens to wreck all plans for parliamentary governance. But
one of the key factors shaping the country right now is a disconnect between
Egypt’s elite and its ordinary citizens. The country’s relatively
sophisticated, cosmopolitan, urban, upper middle class wants modern, democratic
government, but the majority of Egyptians are not part of this class and have
different priorities. Historically this was the situation in France in 1848,
and we see it today in places like Thailand. The name “Napoleon” alone won
French rural support for Louis-Napoleon; in Egypt the label “Islam” is good
enough for many voters.
It’s
difficult if not impossible to resolve this kind of division without some kind
of authoritarian rule. Either the urban middle class imposes its agenda on the
countryside or vice versa. It’s not clear yet which will happen in Egypt, but
the opposition’s panicky reaction to new elections does not speak well of their
prospects.
Friday, February 22, 2013
Obama’s Bad Brotherhood Bet. By Jonathan S. Tobin.
Obama’s Bad Brotherhood Bet. By Jonathan S. Tobin. Commentary, February 21, 2013.
More on Morsi and Egypt here.
Tobin:
For the last few months, conservative critics of the Obama administration’s foreign policy have obsessed about its failure in Libya. The fiasco in Benghazi that took the lives of four Americans including our ambassador deserved more media scrutiny and Republicans are right to continue to demand answers about it. But the unfolding disaster next door in Egypt is a far greater indication of the way the president has blundered abroad than even that tragic episode. Obama’s decision to force the Egyptian military to accept a Muslim Brotherhood government in Cairo and Washington’s subsequent embrace of Mohamed Morsi’s regime has materially aided the descent of the most populous Arab country into the grip of an Islamist party. The Brotherhood regime is determined to extinguish any hope of liberalization in Egypt and its drive to seize total power there is a direct threat to regional stability and Middle East peace.
Rather than using the leverage that the more than $1 billion in U.S. aid to Egypt gives it, the administration has loyally stuck to Morsi despite his seizing of powers that are comparable to those of deposed dictator Hosni Mubarak and his efforts to violently repress the widespread dissatisfaction with his government. There is no sign that anyone in the State Department or the White House realizes that the U.S. bet on the Brotherhood is a disaster, but yesterday’s column by one of the leading peddlers of conventional wisdom on foreign policy ought to concern Morsi. If the Islamists have lost Thomas Friedman, then there is at least a little hope that their campaign to swindle American liberals into backing them is going to eventually crash.
In yesterday’s New York Times, Friedman did something we haven’t seen much of in that newspaper: tell the truth about the Brotherhood’s intentions and its ideological drive to transform Egypt. While the paper’s news pages and fellow columnists like Nicholas Kristof have bought into the baloney the Brotherhood has served up to foreign journalists about their moderation and desire for democracy and progress, Friedman made it clear that their tyrannical impulse is no aberration. Even more important, he made it clear that the Obama administration’s apparent belief that they can reinvent the modus vivendi that formally existed between the U.S. and Mubarak with Morsi is a terrible mistake.
As Friedman notes, the Brotherhood has prioritized the cleansing of non-Islamist aspects of Egyptian culture over its supposed hope to reboot the economy. The banning of the Belly Dancing Channel on Egyptian TV made for a comic lede for Friedman’s column, but it is no joke, as it illustrates Morsi’s desire to turn a multi-faceted society into another Iran.
Yet as right as Friedman is about the current situation, his advice about the Brotherhood having to change or fail misses the point about a movement that has no intention of ever allowing power to slip from its hands. Friedman is right that the Brotherhood’s version of political Islam will sink Egypt into poverty. The problem is that they are no more willing or capable of becoming more democratic or open-minded about non-Islamist culture than they are of ever accepting peace with Israel.
Friedman praises what he claims is an Obama administration decision to convey their concerns about the direction of Egypt privately rather than publicly. He also supports an apparent decision to invite Morsi to Washington for a visit where he can try to charm the U.S. into keeping the flow of American taxpayer dollars into his government’s coffers.
But the more time the U.S. takes in conveying the message that it will not back an Egyptian government intent on an Islamist kulturkampf, the less chance there will be that it can influence events in Cairo. We already know what a bad bet Obama has made in backing Morsi and the Brotherhood. It may already be too late to reverse the damage that was done by the president’s feckless embrace of the Islamists. If, as Friedman acknowledges, the direction the Brotherhood is taking Egypt, and by extension the region, is one that can lead to chaos, tyranny and violence, an American decision to cut Morsi off can’t come too soon.
More on Morsi and Egypt here.
Tobin:
For the last few months, conservative critics of the Obama administration’s foreign policy have obsessed about its failure in Libya. The fiasco in Benghazi that took the lives of four Americans including our ambassador deserved more media scrutiny and Republicans are right to continue to demand answers about it. But the unfolding disaster next door in Egypt is a far greater indication of the way the president has blundered abroad than even that tragic episode. Obama’s decision to force the Egyptian military to accept a Muslim Brotherhood government in Cairo and Washington’s subsequent embrace of Mohamed Morsi’s regime has materially aided the descent of the most populous Arab country into the grip of an Islamist party. The Brotherhood regime is determined to extinguish any hope of liberalization in Egypt and its drive to seize total power there is a direct threat to regional stability and Middle East peace.
Rather than using the leverage that the more than $1 billion in U.S. aid to Egypt gives it, the administration has loyally stuck to Morsi despite his seizing of powers that are comparable to those of deposed dictator Hosni Mubarak and his efforts to violently repress the widespread dissatisfaction with his government. There is no sign that anyone in the State Department or the White House realizes that the U.S. bet on the Brotherhood is a disaster, but yesterday’s column by one of the leading peddlers of conventional wisdom on foreign policy ought to concern Morsi. If the Islamists have lost Thomas Friedman, then there is at least a little hope that their campaign to swindle American liberals into backing them is going to eventually crash.
In yesterday’s New York Times, Friedman did something we haven’t seen much of in that newspaper: tell the truth about the Brotherhood’s intentions and its ideological drive to transform Egypt. While the paper’s news pages and fellow columnists like Nicholas Kristof have bought into the baloney the Brotherhood has served up to foreign journalists about their moderation and desire for democracy and progress, Friedman made it clear that their tyrannical impulse is no aberration. Even more important, he made it clear that the Obama administration’s apparent belief that they can reinvent the modus vivendi that formally existed between the U.S. and Mubarak with Morsi is a terrible mistake.
As Friedman notes, the Brotherhood has prioritized the cleansing of non-Islamist aspects of Egyptian culture over its supposed hope to reboot the economy. The banning of the Belly Dancing Channel on Egyptian TV made for a comic lede for Friedman’s column, but it is no joke, as it illustrates Morsi’s desire to turn a multi-faceted society into another Iran.
Yet as right as Friedman is about the current situation, his advice about the Brotherhood having to change or fail misses the point about a movement that has no intention of ever allowing power to slip from its hands. Friedman is right that the Brotherhood’s version of political Islam will sink Egypt into poverty. The problem is that they are no more willing or capable of becoming more democratic or open-minded about non-Islamist culture than they are of ever accepting peace with Israel.
Friedman praises what he claims is an Obama administration decision to convey their concerns about the direction of Egypt privately rather than publicly. He also supports an apparent decision to invite Morsi to Washington for a visit where he can try to charm the U.S. into keeping the flow of American taxpayer dollars into his government’s coffers.
But the more time the U.S. takes in conveying the message that it will not back an Egyptian government intent on an Islamist kulturkampf, the less chance there will be that it can influence events in Cairo. We already know what a bad bet Obama has made in backing Morsi and the Brotherhood. It may already be too late to reverse the damage that was done by the president’s feckless embrace of the Islamists. If, as Friedman acknowledges, the direction the Brotherhood is taking Egypt, and by extension the region, is one that can lead to chaos, tyranny and violence, an American decision to cut Morsi off can’t come too soon.
The Regime’s Sensitivity Training. By Rush Limbaugh.
The Regime’s Sensitivity Training. By Rush Limbaugh. RushLimbaugh.com, February 22, 2013.
Obama: Republicans’ Refusal to Raise Taxes on the Wealthy Is What “Binds Their Party Together.”
Obama: Republicans’ Refusal to Raise Taxes on the Wealthy Is What “Binds Their Party Together.” By Susan Jones. CNSNews.com, February 22, 2013. Video here.
Obama To Al Sharpton: View That “Nothing Is Important Enough” To Raise Taxes Is What “Binds” GOP. By Meenal Vamburkar. Mediaite, February 22, 2013. With complete audio.
Obama on Al Sharpton: It’s hard for Republicans to see the obvious answer. By Michal Conger. Washington Examiner, February 21, 2013.
Obama: Cuts that Hurt the Economy are GOP’s Raison D’etre. By John Sexton. Breitbart, February 21, 2013. Audio at YouTube.
Obama: Helping Rich “Thing That Binds” GOP Together. Washington Free Beacon, February 21, 2013.
Obama: Helping Rich “The Thing That Binds”Republicans Together. Real Clear Politics, February 21, 2013.
And Another Thing About Obama’s Appearance Al Sharpton’s radio show! By Debra Heine. Breitbart, February 22, 2013.
Mark Levin blasts Obama for smearing American people, and GOP for throwing in with Obama. The Right Scoop, February 21, 2013.
Obama on Republicans:
My sense is that their basic view is nothing is important enough to raise taxes on wealthy individuals or corporations. And they would prefer to see these kinds of cuts that could slow down our recovery over closing tax loopholes, and that’s the thing that binds their party together at this point.
Heine:
This is our president talking about us – all Republicans. We only care about the rich. We are motivated only by a selfish, base desire to protect ourselves from paying our “fair share,” “millionaires and billionaires” that we all are. Our selfishness is what binds us together.
It couldn’t be that we think more taxes would kill jobs and slow down the economy – it couldn’t be that we believe we have a serious debt problem and spending has to be reduced to prevent a financial meltdown.
My God.
We’ve gotten so used to being demonized in this way, we’re numb to it – it barely causes raised eyebrows anymore. But I still remember how shocking it was in 2009 to see the President of the United States behaving like a rabble-rousing community organizer – writ large – gleefully pitting Americans against each other.
It took this epic rant from Mark Levin to make me notice that, yeah, Obama was attacking us, again, and wow – how galling of him to use this class warfare argument in light of the fact that he and Michelle are the ones constantly running off to West Palm Beach, Hawaii, Aspen, Martha’s Vineyard, etc.
Where’s the Republican leadership? Why do they let him get away with that? Marco Rubio touched on Obama's tendency to impugn the motives of his adversaries in his response to the SOTU. That was for me, the best part of his speech because it was a stake in the heart of Obama’s favorite Alinsky tactic. No wonder all libs wanted to talk about afterward was Rubio’s drink of water.
Republicans need to be calling Obama out on that every time he does it, and honestly explaining to the American people the dire straits we’re in, instead of cowering in fear and worrying about who gets the blame.
Obama To Al Sharpton: View That “Nothing Is Important Enough” To Raise Taxes Is What “Binds” GOP. By Meenal Vamburkar. Mediaite, February 22, 2013. With complete audio.
Obama on Al Sharpton: It’s hard for Republicans to see the obvious answer. By Michal Conger. Washington Examiner, February 21, 2013.
Obama: Cuts that Hurt the Economy are GOP’s Raison D’etre. By John Sexton. Breitbart, February 21, 2013. Audio at YouTube.
Obama: Helping Rich “Thing That Binds” GOP Together. Washington Free Beacon, February 21, 2013.
Obama: Helping Rich “The Thing That Binds”Republicans Together. Real Clear Politics, February 21, 2013.
And Another Thing About Obama’s Appearance Al Sharpton’s radio show! By Debra Heine. Breitbart, February 22, 2013.
Mark Levin blasts Obama for smearing American people, and GOP for throwing in with Obama. The Right Scoop, February 21, 2013.
Obama on Republicans:
My sense is that their basic view is nothing is important enough to raise taxes on wealthy individuals or corporations. And they would prefer to see these kinds of cuts that could slow down our recovery over closing tax loopholes, and that’s the thing that binds their party together at this point.
Heine:
This is our president talking about us – all Republicans. We only care about the rich. We are motivated only by a selfish, base desire to protect ourselves from paying our “fair share,” “millionaires and billionaires” that we all are. Our selfishness is what binds us together.
It couldn’t be that we think more taxes would kill jobs and slow down the economy – it couldn’t be that we believe we have a serious debt problem and spending has to be reduced to prevent a financial meltdown.
My God.
We’ve gotten so used to being demonized in this way, we’re numb to it – it barely causes raised eyebrows anymore. But I still remember how shocking it was in 2009 to see the President of the United States behaving like a rabble-rousing community organizer – writ large – gleefully pitting Americans against each other.
It took this epic rant from Mark Levin to make me notice that, yeah, Obama was attacking us, again, and wow – how galling of him to use this class warfare argument in light of the fact that he and Michelle are the ones constantly running off to West Palm Beach, Hawaii, Aspen, Martha’s Vineyard, etc.
Where’s the Republican leadership? Why do they let him get away with that? Marco Rubio touched on Obama's tendency to impugn the motives of his adversaries in his response to the SOTU. That was for me, the best part of his speech because it was a stake in the heart of Obama’s favorite Alinsky tactic. No wonder all libs wanted to talk about afterward was Rubio’s drink of water.
Republicans need to be calling Obama out on that every time he does it, and honestly explaining to the American people the dire straits we’re in, instead of cowering in fear and worrying about who gets the blame.
Egypt and Tunisia: New Leaders, Same Brutality. By Erin Cunningham.
New leaders in Egypt and Tunisia, same security forces. By Erin Cunningham, Global Post, February 21, 2013.
China’s “Leftover Women,” Unmarried at 27. By Mary Kay Magistad.
China’s “leftover women,” unmarried at 27. By Mary Kay Magistad. BBC News Magazine, February 20, 2013. Also at PRI.org.
Sheng nu (leftover women). Wikipedia.
Elite Single Chinese Face “Leftover Lady” Discount. By Jia You. WeNews, September 11, 2011.
For China’s Educated Single Ladies, Finding Love Is Often a Struggle. By Sushma Subramanian and Deborah Jian Lee. The Atlantic, October 19, 2011. Also at Pulitzer Center on Crisis Reporting.
China’s “Leftover” Women. By Leta Hong Fincher. New York Times, October 11, 2012.
China’s “leftover women” choosing to stay single. By Leta Hong Fincher. CNN, August 21, 2013.
Letter to Parents Worried About Their Daughter Becoming a “Leftover Woman.” By Joy Chen. The Huffington Post, March 4, 2013. Also at Global Rencai.
China’s “Leftover Women” Desperate to Find Mr. Right. By Susan Donaldson James. ABC News, July 11, 2013.
China’s shengnu, or “leftover women,” face intense pressure to marry. By Julie Makinen and Don Lee. Los Angeles Times, July 13, 2013.
A good man is hard to find: China's “leftover women” look for love abroad. By Isobel Yeung. South China Morning Post Magazine, April 27, 2014.
Over 27? Unmarried? Female? You’d be on the scrapheap in China. By Marta Cooper. The Telegraph, April 30, 2014.
If Asian Women Hit on White Dudes the Way White Dudes Hit on Asian Women. By Alanna Vagianos. The Huffington Post, November 11, 2014.
“Yellow fever” fetish: Why do so many white men want to date a Chinese woman? By Yuan Ren. The Telegraph, July 1, 2014.
Yellow Fever: Dating as an Asian Woman. By Lauren sMash. Persephone Magazine, January 26, 2012. Also at Everyday Feminism.
The Startling Plight of China’s Leftover Ladies. By Christina Larson. Foreign Policy, May/June 2012.
Author Joy Chen on marriage, work and life. Video. chinadailyus, December 11, 2012. YouTube. Also at YouKu.
Sheng nu (leftover women). Wikipedia.
Elite Single Chinese Face “Leftover Lady” Discount. By Jia You. WeNews, September 11, 2011.
For China’s Educated Single Ladies, Finding Love Is Often a Struggle. By Sushma Subramanian and Deborah Jian Lee. The Atlantic, October 19, 2011. Also at Pulitzer Center on Crisis Reporting.
China’s “Leftover” Women. By Leta Hong Fincher. New York Times, October 11, 2012.
China’s “leftover women” choosing to stay single. By Leta Hong Fincher. CNN, August 21, 2013.
Letter to Parents Worried About Their Daughter Becoming a “Leftover Woman.” By Joy Chen. The Huffington Post, March 4, 2013. Also at Global Rencai.
China’s “Leftover Women” Desperate to Find Mr. Right. By Susan Donaldson James. ABC News, July 11, 2013.
China’s shengnu, or “leftover women,” face intense pressure to marry. By Julie Makinen and Don Lee. Los Angeles Times, July 13, 2013.
A good man is hard to find: China's “leftover women” look for love abroad. By Isobel Yeung. South China Morning Post Magazine, April 27, 2014.
Over 27? Unmarried? Female? You’d be on the scrapheap in China. By Marta Cooper. The Telegraph, April 30, 2014.
If Asian Women Hit on White Dudes the Way White Dudes Hit on Asian Women. By Alanna Vagianos. The Huffington Post, November 11, 2014.
“Yellow fever” fetish: Why do so many white men want to date a Chinese woman? By Yuan Ren. The Telegraph, July 1, 2014.
Yellow Fever: Dating as an Asian Woman. By Lauren sMash. Persephone Magazine, January 26, 2012. Also at Everyday Feminism.
The Startling Plight of China’s Leftover Ladies. By Christina Larson. Foreign Policy, May/June 2012.
Who are
you calling “leftover?” Huang Yuanyuan (front) and her colleague Wang Tingting.
Author Joy Chen on marriage, work and life. Video. chinadailyus, December 11, 2012. YouTube. Also at YouKu.
Plight of young “leftover women” in China. By Chip Reid. Video and transcript. CBS This Morning. CBS News, June 28, 2012. YouTube.
National Rifle Association Ad: Stand and Fight, “We Are America” Video.
National Rifle Association Ad: Stand and Fight, “We are America” Video. The Daily Caller, February 20, 2013.
Who’s winning the message war over gun control? Video. America Live with Megyn Kelly. Fox News, February 22, 2013.
NRA Stand and Fight: We Are America. NRA Videos, February 20, 2013. YouTube.
A sharp, visually powerful statement of the Jacksonian concept of liberty.
NRA:
In a recent closed-door speech to donors, politicians and media, Bill Clinton spoke about American gun owners:
“A lot of these people … all they’ve got is their hunting and their fishing.”
“Or they’ve been listening to this stuff for so long that they believe it all.”
And we all remember Barack Obama’s 2008 comments to a room of San Francisco elites:
“It’s not surprising then they get bitter, they cling to guns or religion.”
The arrogance of their superiority requires this reminder:
They don’t rule us.
They don’t give us rights. We grant them power.
They don’t make us safe. We pay to protect them.
They don’t make us free. We’re free already.
And as long as we have the Second Amendment, we always will be.
We are America and our politicians are only as powerful as we, the people allow them to be.
NRA STAND AND FIGHT
Who’s winning the message war over gun control? Video. America Live with Megyn Kelly. Fox News, February 22, 2013.
NRA Stand and Fight: We Are America. NRA Videos, February 20, 2013. YouTube.
A sharp, visually powerful statement of the Jacksonian concept of liberty.
NRA:
In a recent closed-door speech to donors, politicians and media, Bill Clinton spoke about American gun owners:
“A lot of these people … all they’ve got is their hunting and their fishing.”
“Or they’ve been listening to this stuff for so long that they believe it all.”
And we all remember Barack Obama’s 2008 comments to a room of San Francisco elites:
“It’s not surprising then they get bitter, they cling to guns or religion.”
The arrogance of their superiority requires this reminder:
They don’t rule us.
They don’t give us rights. We grant them power.
They don’t make us safe. We pay to protect them.
They don’t make us free. We’re free already.
And as long as we have the Second Amendment, we always will be.
We are America and our politicians are only as powerful as we, the people allow them to be.
NRA STAND AND FIGHT
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)