Israel’s Arabs: Not Zionists, But Israelis. By Leon Hadar.
Israel’s Arabs: Not Zionists, But Israelis. By Leon Hadar. The National Interest, January 15, 2014.
That is certainly no way to integrate Israeli Arabs into the workforce. By Meirav Arlosoroff. Haaretz, January 9, 2014.
Israeli Arabs Want to Remain in Israel. By David Lange (Aussie Dave). Israellycool, January 14, 2014.
Israel-Arabs Prefer to Remain Israelis, Despite FM Lieberman’s Call for Territory Swap. By Joshua Levitt. The Algemeiner, January 10, 2014.
Israeli Arabs: We Do Not Want to Live in Palestinian State. By Khaled Abu Toameh. Gatestone Institute, January 6, 2014.
Arab Israelis describe how they want to remain Israeli. Video. elderofziyon2, January 8, 2014. YouTube.
Hadar:
If the
tens of thousands of mostly Serb residents of northern Kosovo were asked
whether they would like to see their region annexed to and become an integral
part of Serbia or would prefer to remain part of Kosovo, there is little doubt
that a huge majority of them would vote for joining the Serbian homeland
instead of co-existing with the Albanian majority in the unitary state of
Kosovo, and that the Serbian people would enthusiastically support the idea of
annexing northern Kosovo to their state.
In fact,
irredentism, the drive to annex territories and people governed by another
state on the grounds of common national, ethnic, or religious ties even if
means redrawing existing borders, has been a powerful force in world politics,
with the most historically explosive case being the annexation of the
German-speaking Sudetenland in Czechoslovakia to Nazi Germany in 1938.
So how
does one explain the rejection by the majority of Israel’s Arab minority, as
well as by Palestinian Authority (PA) President Mahmoud Abbas, of the proposal
that some of the county’s Arab towns and villages near the border of the future
Palestinian state be handed over to Palestine in exchange for parts of the West
Bank where Jewish settlers live?
The
plan applies to about 200,000 Israeli Arabs who live in the towns and villages
along the 1967 cease-fire line (Green Line) between Jerusalem and Ramallah,
also known as the Triangle.
While
it is true that the proposal of land and population swaps with the PA has been
advanced by one of Israel’s leading ultra-nationalist figures, Foreign Minister
Avigdor Lieberman, it should not be dismissed as a merely reflection of a
radical right wing agenda.
Lieberman,
after all, has not called for the forced transfer or expulsion of Arabs out of
Israel and he based it on the expectation that it would be part of a deal with
the government of Palestine and not a unilateral move on the part of Israel.
Moreover,
Arab citizens of Israel have been complaining for years that they feel they are
treated as second-class citizens by a state that defines itself as Jewish and
has national symbols, including the flag and the national anthem, that give
expression to that unique form of identity that merges nationalist, religious,
ethnic, and linguistic components, in the same way that Arab nationalism and to
some extent the Muslim religion are central to the identity of the Palestinian
people.
Indeed,
Arab Israeli public figures, including a member of the Supreme Court and the
Knesset (parliament) admitted that they do not sing the Israeli national anthem
(“Hatikvah”) that recalls the historical longing of the Jewish people to the
Land of Israel, and according to opinion polls, 22 percent of Israeli Arabs
define themselves strictly as Palestinians; 45 percent identify themselves as
Palestinian Israelis; and only 32 percent defined themselves as Israeli Arabs.
But
then the result of a poll conducted by the Dialogue also indicated that 79
percent of Israeli Arabs are satisfied with their life as citizens of Israel,
and that 53 percent of them oppose any proposal for a land-swap between Israel
and Palestine, with about 65 percent indicating that they reject the idea a new
Palestinian state annexing their towns and villages in Israel (with the
strongest opposition expressed by the Arab residents of the Triangle).
The
city of Umm al-Fahm, which is located in the Triangle, published a statement
after a meeting of the city council calling on PA negotiators to disregard
Lieberman’s offer, underscoring that while Israeli Arabs consider themselves
part of the Palestinian nation, they “are unwilling to act as pawns in the service of Lieberman and the Israeli right.” A survey conducted in July 2000 by
the Arab-Israeli weekly Kul al-Arab among the residents of Umm al-Fahm, found that
83 percent of them opposed transferring their town to the PA.
One
Israeli-Arab resident of Umm al-Fahm interviewed this month on Israel’s Channel
10 television channel explained that “I don’t want to be under [PA President
Mahmoud] Abbas’ or the Palestinians’ rule. I want to stay here under Israeli
rule,” explaining that he considered himself to be “a Palestinian, but also an
Israeli.” An Arab woman shopping in a mall interviewed by Channel 10 said, “We
love Israel. We love living in Israel. Our whole life is in Israel. We don’t
want to live with the Palestinians and have nothing in Palestine.”
Lieberman
has insisted that without territorial and population swaps, he does not intend
to support any deal reached between the Israelis and Palestinians that could
emerge out of the current negotiations conducted under American diplomatic
auspices.
But it
is also important to recall that similar population swaps were already proposed
in previous peace negotiations and were dismissed by both Palestinians and
Israelis as impractical, since Arab Israeli citizens could appeal to the
Israeli Supreme Court if and when such a plan would be approved by the Israeli
government and the court could support their petition, and at the minimum,
would probably debate it for months if not years.
But the
hostile response by so many Israeli Arabs to the idea of being annexed by a
future Palestinian state and their determination to remain an integral part of
the State of Israel despite the political and economic problems involved in
their integration into a Jewish State whose national identity they do not
share, may be a sign that they prefer the relative political and economic
freedom they enjoy in a western society like Israel over a future in what even
under the best case scenario would be an Arab state with third-world living
standards and emergent democratic institutions.
“We are
proud of our Arab-Palestinian identity but we are citizens of Israel, where we
work here, and here we will die,” said Maazan Gaanim, the mayor of the Arab
town of Sahnin in the Galilee in a recent interview with Haaretz. “Talk with us
about social justice and building trust instead of [land swaps]. I bet you that
not even one Arab Israeli is planning to move [to Palestine].”