Moderate Islam’s Real Litmus Test? Israel. By Liel Leibovitz. Tablet, December 7, 2015.
Leibovitz:
The San Bernardino shooter’s father teaches us a painful lesson about unchecked bigotry.
The San Bernardino shooter’s father teaches us a painful lesson about unchecked bigotry.
Has the
American Dream a better ambassador than Syed Farook? The father of suspected
San Bernardino shooter Syed Rizwan Farook arrived from Pakistan in 1973,
determined to make a better life for himself and his family. He earned a degree
in engineering, worked hard, and raised his children; one of them, Syed Raheel
Farook, joined the Navy and, for his dedicated service, was awarded the
National Defense Service Medal, the Global War on Terrorism Expeditionary
Medal, the Global War on Terrorism Service Medal, and the Sea Service
Deployment Ribbon. All the evidence we have right now, then, suggests that
Farook, Sr. is the embodiment of the genus decent people everywhere so
desperately seek, the moderate Muslim. In a recent interview with the Italian
newspaper La Stampa, Farook played the part well, declaring himself in complete
despair and disbelief over his son’s alleged massacre.
How,
then, did Farook soothe his son when junior ranted about Israel?
“I told
him he had to stay calm and be patient,” Farook, Sr. told his interviewer,
“because in two years Israel will not exist any more. Geopolitics is changing:
Russia, China and America don’t want Jews there any more. They are going to
bring the Jews back to Ukraine. What is the point of fighting? We have already
done it and we lost. Israel is not to be fought with weapons, but with
politics. But he did not listen to me, he was obsessed.”
It’s
hardly appealing to judge a bereaved father—even the father of an alleged
homicidal maniac—in his time of grief, but Farook’s comments are telling. They
reveal a fundamental flaw in the convenient dichotomy we’ve set up for
ourselves, insisting that Muslims came in two shades—good and moderate, bad and
murderous—and that it was our duty as enlightened and gentle folk to sort the
two out lest some drooling bigot jump to the wrong conclusion.
To
better understand this predicament, contemplate the following scenario: imagine
hearing someone described as a moderate Christian conservative, except that he
looks forward to all the homosexuals being rounded up in the near future and
shipped off to Monaco. Or imagine a so-called moderate white guy saying that
while white Americans have tried and failed to keep blacks down by means of
violence, there’s nothing to worry about because sooner or later the blacks
will all be stacked into boats and shipped back to Africa. If you heard this,
you would likely be appalled, and then declare that while you can think of
quite a few adjectives to describe the person in question, “moderate” is
certainly not one of them.
And
yet, when it comes to moderate Muslims, we view Jew-hating as understandable,
even acceptable. In Bedfordshire, England, for example, the local police
launched a social media campaign to promote tolerance and diversity, featuring
an officer standing side by side in solidarity with Qadeer Baskh, the chairman
of the local Luton Islamic Centre. Jews, that institution’s website makes
clear, are the “brethren of swine and pigs,” who “strive their utmost to
corrupt the beliefs, morals, and manners of Muslims” and must therefore be
vanquished. You can hear similar opinions from celebrated moderates in Amman,
Cairo, Brooklyn, and elsewhere.
These
vile statements, usually, are explained away by mumbling something about the
occupation or Gaza or the lasting effect of a strange religious conflict over
some faraway land none of us well-heeled westerners have any business trying to
understand. That’s a travesty. A tiny religious minority group with its own
independent national existence, Jews are the Middle East’s essential others. A
failure to think of them in any other way but yearning for their destruction,
and you could neither call yourself a moderate nor hope to ever strike roots in
a democratic society that still believes in the bounties of peace, pluralism,
and liberty.
It’s
time, then, for a new litmus test. It’s this: No moderate Muslim should ever
reject the state of Israel’s right to exist. Criticism, even of the vociferous
kind, is fair and welcome; fantasies about huddled Jewish masses banished to
the Ukraine aren’t. If you fail to pass this simple test, it’s only a matter of
time before you or someone you love picks up a gun and goes gunning for the
Jews, the Jews-for-Jesus, the Christians, and all the others who do not share
your hateful worldview.