Five Lessons for Kiev from the Arab Spring. By Juan Cole.
5 Lessons for Kiev from the Arab Spring. By Juan Cole. History News Network, February 23, 2014. Also at Informed Comment.
Yulia Tymoshenko Is Freed as Ukraine Leader Flees. By Andrew Higgins and Andrew E. Kramer. New York Times, February 22, 2014.
A new day in Ukraine: Political uncertainty sweeps divided nation. By Phil Black, Steve Almasy, and Victoria Butenko. CNN, February 23, 2014.
Tymoshenko returns to Kiev after president’s impeachment. Video. Reuters, February 22, 2014. YouTube.
Tymoshenko: “Their blood will not beforgotten.” Video. Reuters, February 22, 2014. YouTube.
Cole:
The
dramatic overthrow of Ukrainian President Viktor Yanukovych on Saturday, as he
fled the presidential palace and it was occupied by extreme nationalists,
recalls events in the Middle East in 2011.
The
crisis in the Ukraine was provoked last fall when Yanukovych reconsidered
earlier moves toward integration with Europe. He is from the east of the
country, which has many ethnic Russians and which is economically, culturally
and historically deeply entwined with Russia. The offer by Russian President
Vladimir Putin of $15 billion in aid helped to make Yanukovych’s mind up.
In my
view U.S. aggressiveness in the past twenty-three years is part of the problem
here. The U.S. insisted on expanding NATO by absorbing former Warsaw Pact
members and humiliating Russia. The rise of Putin is in part a reaction against
that humiliation. Russia is reasserting itself as a great power, carving out
spheres of influence in the old nineteenth-century way. Ukraine, Kazakhstan and
Syria are in those spheres of influence. In the nineteenth century, wars often
were caused by one country not respecting another’s proclaimed spheres of
influence.
Both
liberal and right-wing youth in the west of Ukraine as well as in the southern
capital of Kyiv (Kiev) were upset by the turn away from Europe. They hope for
Ukraine to become a member of the European Union and entertain hopes that this
step would improve their economic prospects. (Given the sad economic state of
Spain, Greece and other EU members, including persistent unemployment of a
quarter or more of the youth, this conviction is a little difficult to
understand). The more extreme nationalists are reacting against what they see
as Russian dominance (a mirror image of right-wing Greek politics, which is
anti-liberal and anti-EU).
Yanukovych
was forced to give up the enhanced powers he had grabbed for himself and to
restore the 2004 constitution. Parliament immediately acted with its renewed
powers, and impeached Yanukovych. Street politics did the rest.
The
country is now in turmoil. Formerly jailed opposition leader Tymoshenko has
been freed from a seven-year jail sentence (she ran against Yanukovych in 2010
and when she lost he imprisoned her). She had played a role in the Orange
Revolution a decade ago, but has high negatives and some charge she is corrupt.
She has announced she will run for president in elections now scheduled for
May.
Here
are some parallels to the Arab upheavals of 2011 and suggestions for how
Ukraine can avoid another failure in transitioning to democracy:
#1. It
is good that the Ukraine military has declared neutrality. In Libya and Syria
military intervention turned peaceful protests into a civil war. In contrast,
in Tunisia, the military declared neutrality, which contributed to that
country’s peaceful transition.
#2.
Geographical divisions such as those in the Ukraine can be deadly to political
progress. The grievances of the easterners in Libya have affected oil production.
Likewise, in Yemen some of the post-revolution violence and protests have come
from southerners unhappy at northern dominance. Despite their victory on
Saturday, the western forces would be wise to seek a compromise with the east
rather than simply attempting to dictate to the latter.
#3. The
economy is key. People want employment and they want predictable currency rates
for imports. Despite the severe economic problems in the European Union and in
the U.S., the latter two must step up to help in a serious way or a limping
Ukrainian economy could provoke further turmoil. Whereas in Tunisia modest
growth was restored in 2012 and 2013, in Egypt a declining pound harmed
citizens dependent on imported goods (including food, since Egypt can no longer
feed itself). In Tunisia there was a successful transition to new elections. In
Egypt, a vast popular movement challenged the elected president and then the
military moved against him. Differing economic performance is part of the
reason.
#4.
Political compromise is necessary. Allies of Yanukovych may wish to run in the
May elections. They should be allowed to (I’m assuming that since parliament
impeached Yanukovych he won’t be eligible to complete his term or run for a new
one.) Tunisia’s elite hammered out and abided by difficult compromises.
#5.
Extremists can play spoiler. The Ansar al-Sharia in Libya and other extremist
groups have made it difficult for that country to move smoothly toward a new
Brazil. The equivalent group in Tunisia, by assassinating two left wing
politicians, roiled politics in 2013.
It
turns out that it is easier to get rid of a government you don’t like than to
actively acquire a government you do like.